Category Archives: Observations

02.21.2025 – Shoveling Snow and the Use of the Law

It’s been a cold winter in Northeast Indiana, and though our snowfall is a bit below average, we’ve had enough that we’ve needed to keep the snow shovel handy.

As is the case in many places, our municipal code requires accumulated snow to be removed from the sidewalks in front of our houses within 24 hours after the storm has ended its dump. I’m usually out within an hour, which is not the case with many of our neighbors. It seems that some of our neighbors have adopted the snow removal philosophy we often heard when we lived in the real snow country of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan – “spring will come soon enough.”

I make no apologies for my fastidious adherence to the municipal code. Getting the snow off the sidewalks and driveway is not only the right thing to do, it is the safe thing to do.

My problem is not our snow-free concrete. My problem is my humility-free attitude. Like someone with a “Love Spoken Here” lawn sign, I use our clean sidewalks to signal my virtue as compared to my neighbors with the icy and slushy mess they call their driveway and sidewalks.

A lack of humility – judgmentalism and pride – has always been the problem with strict adherence to codes of conduct. Snowy sidewalks ought to be cleared, and love should be spoken everywhere. But when I become proud of my snow shoveling prowess or my imaginary generosity and openness to others, I have a problem. Jesus said something about logs in our eyes (Matthew 7:1-5).

In the Reformed Tradition, we talk about the three uses of the law, that is, the law found in the Ten Commandments and its ethical and moral implications as articulated throughout the Old Testament. Yes, Jesus has fulfilled the requirement of the law on our behalf, but the law is still useful.

Second and third uses of the law first, and then the first.

The second use of the law is a civil use. Municipal codes should reflect the justice and love of kindness required by the law. Shoveling snow off an icy sidewalk is a practical manifestation of love for neighbor.

The third use of the law is personal. Though the Christian has been freed from the burden of the law, the law still serves as a teacher, instructing us in the ways of right living. My love of neighbor would require the snow to be removed from the sidewalk whether or not the municipal code required me to do so.

It is the first use of the law that can be most troubling. Writing of this first use, Calvin says, “The usefulness of the law lies in convicting man of his infirmity and moving him to call upon the remedy of grace which is in Christ.” (Institutes II.vii.8)

Neither the Old Testament law nor Jesus’ interpretation of it speaks to the issue of clearing sidewalks of accumulated snow within 24 hours of a storm’s passing. You can be sure, though, that were there a snow removal provision in the Torah, the Pharisees would have joined me with their shovels in hand within the first hour after the snow quit falling – maybe before the snow quit falling.

Jesus would not condemn my clean sidewalk, but he would condemn my hypocritical attitude. Like the Pharisees praying on the street corners in order to be seen by others (Matthew 6:5), as I compare our sidewalk to our neighbors’ sidewalk, I have received my self-congratulatory reward even as my heart remains a frozen slushy mess.

Maybe I’ll get one of those “Love Spoken Here” lawn signs for our snow-covered front yard. Or maybe I will lean on God’s amazing grace.

02.14.2025 – The Life and Death of Pretty Prairie Church

The Indiana Toll Road is the portion of Interstate 90 that runs from Ohio to Illinois. For most of its distance it hugs the Michigan border. Earlier this week Becky and I were on the Toll Road headed to Chicago, and along the way Becky took the photo shown above – a little country church in Indiana about a half a mile south of the Michigan line.

Yes, it is a great photo and kudos to the photographer.

The scene and the photo taken from the Toll Road have gotten me thinking about the church.

I knew nothing about the church when we saw it on our trip. Since we got  back home, a little Google Maps investigation and search engine work has provided a bit of information. The church is called Pretty Prairie Church, and its denominational website tells us 31 people attend worship at Pretty Prairie on a given Sunday. The satellite view on the map site shows the cemetery that surrounds the church building. Findagrave.com says there are 622 graves in the Pretty Prairie Cemetery; the first burial in the cemetery was nearly 200 years ago, the most recent occurred two weeks ago. The dead outnumber the living at Pretty Prairie 20 to 1. That’s the way it should be. Continue reading

02.07.2025 – An Imperceptible Hiss

 

A few cold Sundays ago, the low tire pressure warning on our car pinged and the light flashed on the dashboard just as we were making the final turn toward the church. No problem getting to worship, and on the way home we stopped at a gas station to fill the tires with air. The right rear was down a little more than the others, but I figured the cold might be affecting the pressure. A week or so later I added some air to all the tires before we began our 1200+ mile trip to Missouri.  Again, that right rear tire seemed to want a little more air than the others. Then last Thursday, about a week after our return from Missouri, the low pressure light flashed again.  That right rear tire had lost another 7 PSI. Time for a visit to the tire shop.

Sure enough, the tire technician found a small nail between the treads. He pulled the nail, plugged the leak, and we were on our way. The right rear tire is holding its air as well as the other three.

So, for more than a month we had been driving round on a right rear tire with a very slight puncture wound. We never heard a hiss. Missouri and back with no problems. I suppose we could have added air every couple of weeks for a long time. I guess we could have ignored that low tire pressure warning light until we happened to find a filling station with an air pump – it’s just that right rear tire down around 7 PSI, we’ll take care of it when we can. Continue reading

01.31.2025 – Certain Hatreds

 

The past two editions of Observations have been, if not political in nature, at least triggered by news from the world of politics (presidential behavior at a state funeral, and presidential pardons of the unsavory sort).  Thinking about what to write in this week’s post, I promised myself that I would not refer to presidential politics.  What, then?  Officiating in the NFL?

But I can’t help myself.  I came across a comment by Donald Trump that got me thinking.

At one of the many executive order signing events last week, a reporter asked the president about a critical comment made by Elon Musk regarding an announcement about funding for the president’s Stargate AI project.  “Were you bothered by the criticism?” the reporter asked.  “No, no,” President Trump answered.  “The people in the deal are very, very smart people.  But Elon, one of the people he happens to hate.”  Then he added, “But I have certain hatreds of people too.”

The interview moved on quickly to China and any leverage the Chinese might have with Russia in terms of ending the war in Ukraine. Continue reading

01.24.2025 – Pardon Me

We’ve been hearing a lot about pardons of the presidential sort.  Both former President Biden and President Trump have used, some would say abused, their power to pardon. A couple of clarifications and then an observation:

  1. The pardons appear to be constitutional, Article II reading in part, “The President …shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” For our purposes, we will use the term pardon, understanding it to mean both reprieve (think a commuted sentence) and pardon. We may not like them, but presidential pardons are not against the law. In Federalist #74, Alexander Hamilton, with Shay’s Rebellion in mind, thought a presidential power to pardon might be helpful as a strategy to insure domestic tranquility. Again, while the recent pardons seem to have done little to insure domestic tranquility, they are allowed by the Constitution.
  2. Just because they pass constitutional muster does not mean we have to like them. Most objective scholars and commentators agree that among the pardons issued by both recent presidents are cases of shameless partisan politics and grievous reversals of justice. If you’d like to argue whose pardons are more grievous or which pardoner is more corrupt, please go to your favorite social media site to do so.
  3. Presidential pardons are not unusual, even if the recent ones seem unusually unsavory. By one estimate the total number of presidential pardons granted since the Constitution was ratified may exceed 40,000. Lincoln’s pardon of Patrick Murphy pictured in the header was granted to a mentally disabled private sentenced to death for desertion. Not unsavory at all.

Continue reading